Talk:Fetal movement

A fact from Fetal movement appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 3 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that fetal movement begins as early as seven weeks after conception?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Vaughan

This article currently has extensive references to the book "How Life Begins: The Science of Life in the Womb" by Christopher Vaughan (1996). Unfortunately, this source is not available online. Therefore, it would be helpful to include quoted excerpts in the footnotes. If I get a chance, I'll try to pick up a copy at the library, in order to extract the relevant excerpts that are currently being relied upon by this article.

I am particularly concerned about the first paragraph of this article, which seems to have some inconsistencies with the following reliable online source:

De Vries, Johanna et al. “Fetal Motility in the First Half of Pregnancy”, in Continuity of Neural Functions from Prenatal to Postnatal Life, page 63 (1984 Cambridge University Press, edited by Heinz F. R. Prechtl).

For example, De Vries writes that reflexive movements and spontaneous movements first appear about the same time, rather than the reflexive movements starting significantly earlier. Also, De Vries writes that spontaneous movement patterns of a normal fetus are believed to be supraspinally determined, because they do not occur in anencephalic fetuses. In contrast, the first paragraph of the present article says that spontaneous movements arise from self-generated nerve impulses originating in the spinal cord.Ferrylodge (talk) 22:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infonomics

From the article: "spontaneous movements may be triggered by either the spine or the brain". How can something be spontaneous if it has a cause? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.188.89.197 (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fetal movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130601182944/http://pregnancyarchive.com/articles/insights-into-early-fetal-development/ to http://pregnancyarchive.com/articles/insights-into-early-fetal-development

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]