Talk:Fantasy painting
Appearance
This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page: • Fantastic art Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Fantastic art Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-14. The result of the discussion was Merge to Fantastic art. |
Merge? Delete?
[edit]This article, insofar as it can be said to have any significant content at all (other than pretty pictures), seems to overlap wholly with the article Fantastic art. I'd recommend that it either be deleted as superfluous or merged into that larger article. Deor 16:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. Goldfritha 20:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- There also seems to be some question about the copyright/licensing status of some of the images appearing here. I know too little about the pictorial side of WP to be sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if many of them start disappearing before long. Deor 22:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Some, yes, but many of them are public domain owing to age. Goldfritha 23:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- There also seems to be some question about the copyright/licensing status of some of the images appearing here. I know too little about the pictorial side of WP to be sure, but I wouldn't be surprised if many of them start disappearing before long. Deor 22:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Personally, I don't think the article contains any content worth merging, and it seems to be part of someone's effort to promote the paintings of Michèle Vincent via WP. Any objection to going the AfD route here? Deor 01:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Put it up and see if anyone objects. Goldfritha 23:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)