This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
To my eyes this is no more than a slightly waffly dictionary definition, and since there isn't an equivalent article in Wiktionary my gut feel is that {{Copy to Wiktionary}} with a {{wi}} soft redirect would be the most appropriate way to handle it. Thoughts anyone? Le Deluge (talk) 13:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully disagree. the article is a stub & badly needs expanding, but the topic "family seat" rates coverage, it ties in to a whole set of concepts around families (both in general and to specific families), estates, inheritance, feudalism, artistocray/monarchy, etc. (also; wiktionary is kind of a mess, if you hadn't noticed... i'm not wildly enthusiastic about wiping out wikip articles & relying on wiktionary to cover them; they haven't quite found their "groove" yet. we could certainly add a link for them, i just don't think we should drop the topic from wikip) i can think of several ways to fill out the article a bit; examples & pictures would be good. more history of the concept would be better. i'll see what i can do, but i'm kind of tied up with other things right now. will have more time later in june. Lx 121 (talk) 08:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
