Talk:Fajr-3
(Redirected from Talk:Fajr-3 (disambiguation))
 | This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 8 October 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Fajr-3 (disambiguation) to Fajr-3. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 8 October 2024
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:58, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
– Per page views, specifically between the current de facto primary topic and Fajr-3 (missile), there is WP:NOPRIMARY. Steel1943 (talk) 21:50, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support the artillery rocket has 5,250 views but the missile has 3,920 and the aircraft has 22. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: I think I get what you mean on the "weak" there, given the specific page view amounts and I was half considering not posting this move request at all. I probably should have mentioned this in my nomination statement, but I think the potential lack of inherent clarity of differentiating between an "artillery rocket" and a "missile" by their names alone, to most readers, is the icing on the cake there. If there's a clear difference between the terms, I'm not seeing it, and it is still making me think there should be a merge discussion (though I am probably wrong regarding the merge.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- Yes indeed, had the missile had 5,000 it wouldn't have been weak but I still don't think the ratios are enough for a primary topic. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: I think I get what you mean on the "weak" there, given the specific page view amounts and I was half considering not posting this move request at all. I probably should have mentioned this in my nomination statement, but I think the potential lack of inherent clarity of differentiating between an "artillery rocket" and a "missile" by their names alone, to most readers, is the icing on the cake there. If there's a clear difference between the terms, I'm not seeing it, and it is still making me think there should be a merge discussion (though I am probably wrong regarding the merge.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.