Talk:Dice.com

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page already moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:08, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Athard/Dice.com → Dice.com — This userspace draft is ready for the mainspace Cunard (talk • contribs) 03:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using multiple secondary reliable sources, I rewrote the article during Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Athard/dice.com to demonstrate that Dice.com passes Wikipedia:Notability (web). See before the rewrite vs. after the rewrite. Shortly after the MfD was closed, I moved the userspace draft to the mainspace because the article was ready. Athard (talk · contribs) requested that the article be moved back to userspace because

“

Could we keep http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dice.com in the work area for now and not make it live? I would like to add more information to the article and had merely asked for help for the first part that I wrote, to make sure that I was on the right path. This article is not ready for the live area. Athard (talk) (at 14:49 on 8th March

”

On 04:54 on 9th March, I asked Athard to move it back to the mainspace because, with my addition of reliable sources, there would be no chance of it getting deleted. A week later, there has been no response, and I do not believe I will be getting one, since Athard (talk · contribs) ignored a question I asked him/her on 21:10 on 4th March.

I do not want this well-sourced article to remain indefinitely in the userspace, so I would like it to be moved back to Dice.com. Cunard (talk) 03:55, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the admin who moved it to the userspace - and since Athard has not responded to your query - I am going to move it back to article space unless there are any objections at RM. Having had a look at it, I agree with you that it is ready! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I had originally moved it, as it was listed in the "backlog" because of the quote above from 8th March! That is why it has been moved back here. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 08:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing that and for reviewing my changes to the article. Cunard (talk) 09:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The bot got confused with the date in the quote you gave above, so it thought it was an expired RM! I've corrected it, but the bot still hasn't quite got it right... but at least it's in the right section now! -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Writing style

I think that things like On any given day, Dice.com has approximately 60,000 tech job listings. and Founded in 1990 by Lloyd Linn and Diane Rickert, two former contractors, Dice.com had 175 employees by April 2001.[9][10] Today, Dice Holdings, Inc. has 265 employees worldwide. sound more like promotional material than a Wikipedia article, but I could be wrong. What do you think? Impetiredome (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate Propaganda

This article's NPOV is about equivalent to that of my tight, virginal Franco-American sphincter.

Could someone who is not In League With Satan please step up to the plate and replace this sorry mess with something that doesn't come from an ad agency. THnax! 2601:1C2:4E02:3C3E:B023:9FDF:BB56:4924 (talk) 16:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC) User_Talk:MichaelCrawford[reply]

Updated Dice.com Job Count

Hi, I wanted to suggest that the job count be updated for Dice.com in the first paragraph. Based on information provided to investors on May 1, 2014, "Dice.com typically has approximately 80,000 job listings."

"Dice.com Monthly Job Data". Dice.com. Retrieved 14 May 2014.

I am a director at Dice.com, but this information does come from material provided to investors. If this up to date job count was included, you could delete the phrase "In June 2009, Dice.com advertised 48,000 jobs at the bottom of the first paragraph. What do you think? Jonathan DiceHoldings (talk) 15:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jonathan DiceHoldings (talk · contribs). Thank you for posting this update on the talk page. I have added "In 2014, Dice.com advertised 80,000 positions daily" to the article. Cunard (talk) 03:04, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DHI

Apparently Dice Holdings, Inc. renamed itself to DHI Group, Inc., which doesn't stand for Dice Holdings, Inc. Group, Inc. but for Delivering Hire Insights Group, Inc..[1] --92.208.243.17 (talk) 12:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stumbled across this. The link is wrong. "DHI Group" links to "DHI (company)", a Danish company. I suggest renaming/moving Dice.com to "DHI Group" with appropriate adjustments to the article to reflect the history (= Dice.com) and current setup. Kr 17387349L8764 (talk) 10:42, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dice.com. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Efinancialcareers.com" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Efinancialcareers.com has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10 § Efinancialcareers.com until a consensus is reached. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]