Talk:Fastra II/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Is it 'Fastra' or 'FASTRA'? If it is not an acronym, it should be the former. If such, all instances need to be changed to this.
I'm a little uncertain if the image meets the fair use criteria. In particular, it would only be accepted if the computer is not available for the public to take images of. I'll allow it under doubt, but I won't support it if other people feel it is a breach.
How about merging the whole lead into one paragraph. As they stand now, they are too short to be paragraphs.
The information about the project's goal and the issues are unreferenced.
All information in the lead should be mentioned in the body as well. This includes issues such as price.

Placing on hold. I'm getting a little tired, so I might find some more stuff next time I have a look too. Arsenikk ^(talk) 23:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Most issues adressed. However, I decided to keep the image in the article, since I consider it 'demonstrational' by showing the graphics cards in action and running. Also, what do you mean with "body" in this case? Hey Mid (contributions) 16:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The body of the article is the main section of text (including everything except the lead and the captions). What is 'FASTRA' an abbreviation for? Arsenikk ^(talk) 14:59, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not really an abbreviation, but it probably stands for "fast", because it is a fast computer. Hey Mid (contributions) 19:56, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the article still has a tiny lead and the main contributor has been indef blocked, I am failing the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 10:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to fix the small lead issue. Are there now any remaining issues with the article? Hey Mid (contribs) 17:27, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]