Talk:Excess reserves

Economics Mid‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Accuracy

I removed the part linking to unicornfunds.com (see the edit for reasons). It still seems that the article does not represent the current state of research (which is limited).

Proposed merge with Bank reserves

This merger makes sense to me. I can see little extra that can be said about this topic. —Theo (Talk) 16:46, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. I am an economist though:)

I disagree also. These are separate terms.

I also disagree.

I agree. Excess reserves are bank reserves held in excess of the MRR. They are certainly different in their effects, but there is space to discuss this in the main article. ~~Schlorkorator~~

China

"China’s central bank moved late Friday to reduce lending to companies and individuals by requiring large commercial banks to increase the amount of cash they park with the central bank. The move, which came earlier than most economists had expected, was meant to slow China’s breakneck economy and inflation." - Bradsher, K. (February 12, 2010) "China’s Central Bank Hits Brake on Hot Economy" New York Times

If China increases excess reserves to slow their economy, does that mean that Paulson, Bernanke, and Geithner were all wrong about the wisdom of interest on reserves? Why can't Sheila Bair call them on it? Is she not pressing her $24B asset detoxification plan because she believes her party's assertions that Obama is a bad leader? 99.27.200.196 (talk) 21:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008"

Why does RoadTrain change the section heading to "General nature of excess reserves"? 168.103.208.100 (talk) 13:50, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's barely about "Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008" itself. If you don't like my heading, offer yours. --RoadTrain (talk) 19:41, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's simply copied from that article. In its current form this article is US-oriented and describes excess reserves persisting in US financial system. It should be rewritten, though I won't change the heading anymore.--RoadTrain (talk) 19:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

QE

QE creates excess reserves due to govt spending not being collected as taxes (i.e saved) is not drained with bonds. Why no mention of QE in the article and all this stuff about monetary base and paying interest on reserves reduces inflation (???) 90.217.167.67 (talk) 21:43, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Working Monetary Base

This section is confused and confusing. I advocate for its deletion. DaveDixon (talk) 17:26, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Excess reserves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090119214214/http://www.newsneconomics.com/2009/01/fomc-minutes-show-fed-is-trying-to.html to http://www.newsneconomics.com/2009/01/fomc-minutes-show-fed-is-trying-to.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is current total of excess reserves?

Oh: The line "The Congressional Budget Office estimated that payment of interest on reserve balances would cost the American taxpayers about one tenth of the present 0.25% interest rate on $800 billion in deposits:" might have been appropriate in 2016. Spoiler alert: It isn't 2016 anymore.Jamesdowallen (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Buried elsewhere in the text is a pointed reference to $35 billion paid to banks as interest on their excess reserves. That fact is several months old; the number is now closer to $44 billion I guess. What are a few billion among friends?Jamesdowallen (talk) 09:47, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]