Jump to content

Talk:Eskayan language

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Eskayan)

A note on Eskaya controversies

[edit]

Hello all, If you are new to Eskayology please be aware that study of the Eskaya and the Eskayan language is controversial. For many of the statements made in this article on Eskayan there are alternative and frequently contradictory points of view. I urge any of you who have strong feelings about any particular matter to investigate whether the theory/opinion/counter-theory in question has been expressed before, the circumstances in which it was expressed and the research on which it depends.
I have made every effort to make sure that statements in this article are backed up by reliable data but there will inevitably be errors and I welcome all corrections and fruitful collaborations. What I don't welcome are cut-and-paste jobs from google searches, and references to spurious sites. This is not research – please be considerate of the effort that others have made! I have attempted to catalogue all Eskaya source materials (of varying quality) between 1980 and 1993, listing all claims and counterclaims. This document will be made available shortly and hopefully it will allow you to do a quick check before hitting the edit button.
Cheers, Perezkelly 01:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)Perez[reply]

Eskayan script images

[edit]

I have temporarily removed the Eskayan script images taken from Hector Santos' bibingka site. This was done for two reasons:
1. A citable source for these images cannot be established. They are part of a report on the Eskaya made by Jes Peralta some time in the late 1980s or early 1990s. The report is missing from both the National Museum archives in Manila and the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples. If anyone has a xerox of it somewhere please let me know!
2. Authorities in the Eskaya community have not granted permission for these symbols to be published on bibingka (or elsewhere). Getting permission is a fairly straightforward process but it is time-consuming. I am in the process of seeking permission at the moment.
Thanks, Perezkelly 01:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

They’re VERY slow responders, then. Nearly 13 years so far. Koro Neil (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK now replaced with a new image – sorry for delay! Perezkelly (talk) 06:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eskayan info box

[edit]

Hi there, the Eskayan info box looks great but unfortunately it doesn't work
- There is not yet any available information on the number of speakers. My own personal estimation is less than fifty but this is not an official figure.
-While Eskayan is a speech variety of Cebuano it cannot be classed as Cebuano via Austronesian, Malayo-polynesian, Meso Philippine etc. This is partly because according to conventional methodologies the genetics of a language are framed primarily through lexical comparison, not grammatical comparison. These classifications emerged from the discipline of historical linguistics which is about finding out the origins of languages. Eskayan most likely emerged in situ for a specific purpose and derived its structure but not vocab from Cebuano. It's a complicated state of affairs. Suffice to say, the Eskayan is like Frankenstein's monster: It has no parents and its various parts were intentionally stitched together from other places.
I suggest you take it down before an outraged historical linguist (like Dalubwika) does it for you!
Thanks for the thought though! Perezkelly

copied from User_talk:23prootie

Outraged historical linguist

[edit]

Just to clarify, this comment above ("outraged historical linguist") was not intended literally but rather as a compliment to Dalubwika and to historical linguists generally. I am not a historical linguist myself so I can't claim to be outraged by wrong-footed classifications. In earnest, Perezkelly 12:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Perez[reply]

Phoenician script

[edit]

I am unconvinced that the Phoenician script has elements based on the human anatomy. If someone can verify this I will revert it. Perezkelly 01:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:peerreview

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

  • Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
  • See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
  • There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
  • Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
  • Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
  • o Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
  • Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Indigenous Auxiliary Languages

[edit]

Can anyone help me identify more indigenous auxiliary languages (other than Damin)? Or even better, an analysis of the typology of auxiliary languages? I think this would provide relevant linguistic-anthropological context for the Eskayan situation. Perezkelly 00:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dictionary?

[edit]

It has been said in the article, that lexical comparison had been done with Eskayan. And some results from a comparison of the Swadesh wordlist were given. This is particularly interesting from a project I'm working in. Can this Swadesh wordlist for Eskayan be obtained anywhere? Do you have a link or source? — N-true (talk) 13:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

help needed

[edit]

i need immediate administrator assistance to stop all the moves from Eskayan to Eskayan script, also from Eskaya to Eskaya people as these are arbitrary moves and not a result of a series of discussions among the editors concerned...Pinay (talk•email) 16:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cebuano language

[edit]

Why is this categorized under Cebuano languagge? I know Eskayans speak Cebuano, but thats like Chinese americans speaking English. --Jondel (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thorough revision

[edit]

I notice that a number of edits by Kwamikagami in February this year cite my article in TAJA but have misinterpreted the analysis. This is annoying for me because it makes me look like I am taking a position that I do not subscribe to. It also makes me think that it's time to thoroughly revise this Wikipedia entry to make it consistent with the latest published research on Eskayan. This will take some time but I welcome anybody who wishes to help, especially those with expertise in Philippine anthropology/linguistics. I refer you to 'A note on Eskaya controversies' above. If you want a copy of the document that assesses claims and counterclaims, please get in touch Perezkelly (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Eskayan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Eskayan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

by its own bootstraps

[edit]
It is highly plausible that Eskayan vocabulary was created by taking parallel Spanish-English-Visayan wordlists from textbooks, and replacing the Visayan layer with Eskayan.

So Eskayan vocabulary was borrowed from Eskayan?? Or, as the next section suggests, invented arbitrarily? —Tamfang (talk) 22:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that whoever wrote that meant the latter. Eskayan vocabulary seems invented, with a lot of inspiration from Spanish. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eskayan Wikipedia

[edit]

There should be a version of Wikipedia in Eskayan script. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.74.68 (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Text section

[edit]

The English translation is very inaccurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Eskayan_language&oldid=1207135035"