Jump to content

Talk:Erwin Arnada

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleErwin Arnada has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2013Good article nomineeListed
October 17, 2023Good article reassessmentKept
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 3, 2013.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Erwin Arnada's nudity-free edition of Playboy led to his imprisonment for indecency?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Erwin Arnada/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gilderien (talk · contribs) 22:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial thoughts

[edit]
  • Not a quick-fail
  • "Arnada applied to be a photographer for the daily newspaper Kompas." is not in the citation given.
  • The way you have set up the references is somewhat bizarre. Why?

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 15:24, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Right ok. I have re-read it and I think it meets all the criteria. Although having images is not part of the GA criteria, I would recommend adding them if they are freely available, although my somewhat cursory search failed to turn up any.

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality: Yes. -
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources: Yes, with short style listing multiple online sources -
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: Since there are no images, this does not apply.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: doesn't seem to be possible so technically
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

--Gilderien Chat|List of good deeds 12:17, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: If it cannot be updated, that is not the article's fault. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:34, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article is missing post-2013 information. Z1720 (talk) 18:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Z1720: I will comment here that the article mentions that as of 2013, he seems quite content to slide into obscurity, which may explain lack of following information. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for that note. I determined that the article needed to be updated when I saw statements like, "A movie based on his life is planned..." and "As of 2013 Arnada has been involved with nine feature films..." I am not sure how to research and update these statements. Z1720 (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.