This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovenia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Slovenia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SloveniaWikipedia:WikiProject SloveniaTemplate:WikiProject SloveniaSlovenia
Ernest Peterlin is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
I have no doubt that the trial of Peterlin was conducted for political purposes, but the idea that he was not a collaborator because the trial was politically motivated is complete nonsense. He clearly collaborated with the enemy for an extended period of time against his own countrymen, in such a harsh manner to cause public outcry. Peterlin was not a cleric and was not prosecuted for being one, so a general dismissal (in a religious journal) of the Christmas trials as being staged political trials is hardly reliable in this context to support a description of him being subjected to a "show trial". You need a better source for this. Surely there is something in a judicial or human rights journal that can be used to support such a description. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:15, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I do not object that he was a collaborator, but there is also no serious doubt that the process was a show trial. For the moment, this source should do. I will look for a better one. TadejMmy talk12:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
