Talk:Entertainment Consumers Association

Fair use rationale for Image:Game politics sm.jpg

Image:Game politics sm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Entertainment Consumers Association. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070224130217/http://www.theesa.com/facts/ to http://www.theesa.com/facts/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080526103635/http://www.gamespy.com/articles/876/876057p1.html to http://www.gamespy.com/articles/876/876057p1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Industry Organization?

From the article as it is currently written, it's not clear to me that this was indeed a consumer rights organization, but rather an industry lobby organization that cannily gets its funding from consumers in exchange for discounts. All of their positions appear to be things that will help the industry, and the founder's history as an industry lobbyist. An effort should be made to find sources critical of the ECA's positioning, so that this article doesn't just come off as a press release.

Also, it doesn't appear to be operating anymore. Has not been in the news since 2014, and their website is badly broken. Handpigdad (talk) 07:30, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

according to their filing with the IRS https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/205490032_201712_990EO_2019030816161772.pdf , the organization only reported 196$ in revenue from 2017, down from ~2000 the year before.

2$ in 2018 https://apps.irs.gov/pub/epostcard/cor/205490032_201812_990EO_2020013017084112.pdf.

It's pretty safe to say they aren't meaningfully operating anymore. Handpigdad (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)