Talk:Enough Said/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

I will review this one. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:44, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I could find practically nothing wrong with the prose and layout that is here. However, two things should be added:

• In Critical response, you have no negative views on the movie. But those do exist, such as this one and this one. You should add another paragraph here.
• A section on release on home media is missing.
• Production: You might wanna add that the movie was shot on location. In Los Angeles could also mean in a studio.

That's it, great work so far! You have seven days to adress the issues. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:22, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the review! I think I've addressed the issues you raised. 97198 (talk) 11:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Aaaand, it's a pass :) Congrats! Zwerg Nase (talk) 12:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! 97198 (talk) 13:16, 10 August 2015 (UTC)