Talk:Endemism in the Hawaiian Islands

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hawaii Top‑importance

	Hawaii portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article requires expansion. Please help expand the section or topic described in the comments or talk page.

Ecology Low‑importance

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Inappropriate tone

This article sounds too conversational. It lacks the formal tone of an encyclopedia.

"Distance—remoteness—is a filter. And of those germs of life that occasionally made it through, how many found their way into a suitable microclimate? Whether a seed or spore attached to a lost migrating bird's feather or an insect falling out of the high winds, put there by a storm in its homeland—of these, how many found a place to survive and whatever else was needed to reproduce?"

This quote demonstrates how conversational the article is. I'm not an expert, but putting forward questions, then answering them sounds too casual. Its not just this isolated quote; there are other places. Therefore, I have posted a box on the top of this page. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 20:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile, it was written by an expert. —Viriditas | Talk 11:52, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a disjointed mess of inchohesive sentences and bad grammar. No sources cited. Three of the four external links are all 404. I'm not sure what the original point was.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.88.149.218 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rebuild it?

There are quite a few quality issues with this article. Anyway, were we to solve them, I think it would be appropriate to rename the article, too. A better name would be Flora and fauna in (the) Hawaii (Islands). This would be more in line with other articles describing the wildlife of countries and (eco)regions, and would widen the scope of the article to include the issue of invase species. What do you think? Steinbach (talk) 09:42, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I concur (partly)

Yes, this article definitely needs a complete overhaul, including authoritative PRIMARY references.

However, Hawaii has the highest endemism rates (in a number of broad taxonomic groups) of any place on the planet, so I think it is appropriate to retain the title of the article, possibly alongside another "Flora and fauna..." article, but with the "Endemism..." article having a more specific scope. philiptdotcom (talk) 01:45, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Island formations

I believe it would be beneficial to add estimated dates of island formations. Island formation dates could be a start to deeper discussions and correlations between time and species divergence. Bennett.896 (talk) 20:18, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fleischer, RC; McIntosh, CE; Tarr, CL (1998). "Evolution on a volcanic conveyor belt: using phylogeographic reconstructions and K-Ar - based ages of the Hawaiian Islands to estimate molecular evolutionary rates". Molecular ecology. 7: 533–545.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Endemism in the Hawaiian Islands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060901071853/http://ravenel.si.edu/botany/pacificislandbiodiversity/hawaiianflora/index.htm to http://ravenel.si.edu/botany/pacificislandbiodiversity/hawaiianflora/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tone in Lead

I wasn't planning on editing this page too much, but I want to let anyone that is know that the lead section needs lots of work done on the tone. It isn't very encyclopedic and lacks citations. I also find it too long and wordy, with little factual statements, more essay-like. As I said before, I wasn't going to edit this, but if you needed something from me, go to my talk page. I'm pretty good with fixing tone without removing information, but I've been busy. Thanks, Fishy-Finns (talk) 21:45, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]