Talk:Elisabeth of Schönau

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Saints Low‑importance

	Saints portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Religion Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"not canonized"

Could this be changed to "pre Congregation" to clarify that she is indeed considered to be "in the canon" but it happened before the Congregation for Saints was created? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

women were essentially powerless

This sentence is sourced, but it is still simply an opinion and perhaps the article could indicate this. "While celibacy offered women a sense of freedom, a woman could not officiate in the central practices of the Christian religion, leaving women essentially powerless." Perhaps "While celibacy offered women a sense of freedom, a woman could not officiate in the central practices of the Christian religion, leaving women essentially powerless (as per a common modern interpretation)." --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing a definite ideological bias in this article216.120.209.6 (talk) 20:22, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, the bias is evident but probably unintentional and caused by too heavy a reliance on one publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.0.29 (talk) 01:40, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The bias is strong, and arguably wrong, given that there were medieval women who wielded considerable influence. It seems to represent a very narrow-minded, stereotypical view of the Middle Ages. Andrew Sheedy (talk) 19:51, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Egbert, Eckebert, Ekbert

It's useful to mention once that these forms of the name all occur (if they do) as equivalent, but then I think it is more useful just to use one form in the article, and the form linked to in the corresponding Wiki article (otherwise the question naturally arises, why change it?). --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]