Talk:Betty Little

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

this article

are there any groups that like this woman? Obviously she obtains re-election, so it would seem an NPOV requirement to list what groups support her agenda or what local interests are aligned with her politically. For instance, the North Country is full of hunters who are not supportive of gun contnol bills. People directly along the Hudson aren;t too keen on dredging....et al —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.171 (talk • contribs)

I agree that it is very unbalanced, hopefully someone with knowledge of the area can come in and do a better job. I've tried to take out some of the more egregious stuff. MrPrada (talk) 17:56, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

an overwhelmingly Republican gerrymander? first of all, her district isn't gerrymandered — it consists of six counties in their entirety. and second of all, it is far from overwhelmingly Republican — Barack Obama got 55% of the vote in her Senate district. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.76.242 (talk) 16:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How could this happen?

This page reads like a campaign ad for Little; if the pages for the rest of New York's State Assembly members are similar in nature then perhaps the whole category should be deleted. Duke53 | ^Talk 12:17, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the editor who wrote most of this ([1]) also did a kind of hatchet job on John Sweeney, so they don't seem to be a simple Republican flak. I suspect the problem here is too few readers knowledgeable enough to edit this down to bedrock-- I know I'm not. It will be interesting to see if your fact tags draw any refs or other changes. -- Mwanner | Talk 13:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sweeney (and his actions) did nothing to endear himself to his fellow Republicans; it might very well be the work of a 'simple Reublican flak.' Duke53 | ^Talk 17:27, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Betty Little. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718122159/http://www.wptz.com/news/18550042/detail.html to http://www.wptz.com/news/18550042/detail.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:28, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Betty Little. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314024316/http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BS022302 to http://www.vote-smart.org/issue_rating_category.php?can_id=BS022302

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:52, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]