Jump to content

Talk:Elizabeth Eisenstein

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Died! Exlibris-L

Dear all,

I wanted to report that Elizabeth Eisenstein, a Vassar graduate and the well-known scholar of the history of the book, died on January 31. An obituary has not yet appeared. For those who may be interested, here's a link to a Wikipedia article on her life and career:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Eisenstein

Ronald Patkus Associate Director of the Libraries for Special Collections Adjunct Associate Professor of History Vassar College --87.175.201.3 (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Elizabeth Eisenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

French Revolution

[edit]

The introduction says, first thing: was an American historian of the French Revolution. But then, not a word about her work on the French Revolution in the body of the article or in the bibliography. George Comninel (1987) mentions her intervention in the French Revolution debate. Therefore, it would be a poor solution to simply drop the mention of French Revolution in the introduction. One should instead develop her work on this in the body. At that point, everybody thinks: OK, dear Wikipedian, why don't you do it then? Well, I am not an historian and English is not my mother language. --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 10:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]