Talk:Electoral district of Adelaide

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Adelaide / South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Electoral district of Adelaide is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Adelaide (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

I'd like to use the wikitable class for the past members list in SA electoral district articles to be consistent with Wikipedia's color scheme and tables in NSW. I've modified the article to show what it would look like. -- Newhoggy | Talk 05:38, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think an election box would be more appropriate. Frickeg 04:25, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First three MPs' party affiliations?

Bardolph, Dale and George. Ind Labor, Labor, Labor according to this article. Labor, Unknown, Unknown according to Parl SA. What's right and what's wrong? Timeshift (talk) 04:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-1985 boundaries

I would be interested to know the boundary changes in the redistribution that took the Labor 2PP from 66% to 47% because it really is a very dramatic redistribution. Finding anything on boundaries during this time or beforehand is basically impossible, at least online. Does anyone know what was taken in/out? Timeshift (talk) 05:44, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft redistribution - half of Walkerville up in arms!

It would seem Rachel Sanderson has managed to get half of Walkerville to submit objections to the boundary changes... seven pages worth. It's very amusing to see what reasons they provide, apart from Sanderson's boilerplate content. I've never seen so many submissions before, it is almost as though Sanderson has spearheaded abuse of the submission process. Timeshift (talk) 11:09, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]