Jump to content

Talk:Effective demand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

--Wenxuan Zhu (talk) 12:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

different demands

[edit]

What is the difference between Agreagate demand, Effective Demand,Market Demand and simply the Demand?

Effective demand is a term that comes up in older texts and its meaning is subtle and not exactly equal to modern aggregate demand... The articles should stay separate with interlinks between.--Oracleofottawa (talk) 04:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spillover

[edit]

I believe that the intended word at the end of this section was supposed to be "notional", not "national". In the sentences before, the author discusses "effective demand" and "notional demand", concluding at the end that "effective demand will be less than 'national' demand". I am not an economic expert but unless the author was introducing a new term by using "national demand", I assume it he intended it to be "notional", corresponding to earlier sentences. I was going to mark this as a 'minor edit', but was unsure if the author intended on introducing the new term "national demand" that is the reason for the discussion.--Adrianw61 (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What General Glut controversy???

[edit]

http://images.alternet.org/images/managed/storyimages_1319223516_screenshot20111020at11.27.19am.png As you can see from a graph of productivity vs wages, the two decoupled in 1970 and productivity increases since then have had zero impact on wages. No Say's law, no controversy.70.113.72.73 (talk) 04:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Increase in production without increase in aggregate purchasing power (i.e., effective demand) deepens the recession phase of business cycles. "No Say's Law" and gluts are endemic. Janosabel (talk) 17:53, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation 4 is fake

[edit]

It links to some japanese porn site or something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.84.151.142 (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged with template:dead link Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Effective demand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Effective demand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction is jargon based

[edit]

"...when purchasers are constrained in a different market." Wat does this mean in layman terms?

Methinks it is when customers want a product but have no money to pay for it. Am I in error here? -- Janosabel (talk) 18:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]