Jump to content

Talk:Edward Glover (psychoanalyst)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

EG was a fam,ous psychoanalyst, it must be here Why the Prince kan not endestud that ? An other question ! Bettibossi (talk) 11:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now we're getting somewhere. Do you have any sources which show that he was famous? Prince of Canada t | c 11:17, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent, obviously if a book has been written about him he is likely to be notable. I suggest you read these links--they will help you to structure the article: how to use citations, how to lay out an article, how to choose sources, verifiability, notability. Good luck with the article. Prince of Canada t | c 11:33, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's maby too difficult to endestoud that "source" can be in my head and not in Newsweek or News of Alabama ! He was for exemple the analyst by the daugther of Melanie Klein (Melitta Schmidberger (but who is Melanie Klein ?) and he wrote a lot of articles ands books, too difficult for many people but, translate in a lot of language. Try it, you will like ! Open a dictionary (BE for ex.!) Wiki is for exemple a good "source" [1],[2], [3], Text, talk) 17:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Actually no. Sources need to be independent, reliable, and not 'in your head'. Wikipedia is not a source. What is your native language? I think someone who speaks that language would do better at explaining this to you. Prince of Canada t | c 22:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Potential source indicating notability

[edit]

This book (which I have not read and do not own) seems to indicate in the summary that Glover was a leading figure in a particularly egregious dispute in psychoanalysis. WHilat we may not have the book itself to hand, perhaps this can point the way to appropriate sources on the topic? Fritzpoll (talk) 11:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]