Jump to content

Talk:Édgar Rentería/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Staxringold talkcontribs 22:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

Looks like a very good start! Staxringold talkcontribs 23:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

The bios for the years 2000-2002 on Colombia Link are exactly the same as the ones on MLB.com, so the earlier years were probably taken from an older version. I just used it because the MLB bio only goes back to 2000. Also, nothing on Rentería's page on this website is controversial, and everything can easily be proved. Sanfranciscogiants17 (talk) 10:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Not going to hold it up over this as it does a solid enough job, but the text (particularly the older years) need expansion and refinement (check Google News archives!) for more meat apart from pure stats. It's not bad but you can see some shimmers of recentism when an injured, busted, partial 2010 season and postseason has as much text as 02-03 when he was an All-Star, Gold Glove, and Silver Slugger honoree. Staxringold talkcontribs 23:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Good. Noted that the Boston section should make clear they were displeased with the signing, but that's a small bit. Staxringold talkcontribs 23:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  3. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Don't believe it's required, but ALT text for the images would be nice (and not hard to add). Staxringold talkcontribs 23:27, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: