Talk:Duodenal switch
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Duodenal switch.
|
note
[edit]- Does anyone feel qualified to extend the article to include details of the conversion from Roux-en-Y to DS, which is apparently feasible but difficult? It is an option for those patients who have undergone conservative Roux-en-Y and managed to lose an amount of weight, but not sufficient to bring their BMI down to a more healthful level. AncientBrit 16:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I removed a link which seems to be an advertisement. Sh33na 15:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sh33na (talk • contribs)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Duodenal switch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071111185939/http://www.fortherecordmag.com/archives/ftr_012604p39.shtml to http://www.fortherecordmag.com/archives/ftr_012604p39.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:36, 14 September 2017 (UTC)