Talk:Dreamcatcher (2003 film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dreamcatcher (2003 film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: Canadian / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

request to add an external link

I run a website where we write synopses and spoilers for movies, and I'd really like to link to our Dreamcatcher synopsis. I'm not trying to spam; I'm making this request for about 8 movies in total. I really think this would be useful and informative to anyone looking for a bit more detail on what happens in the movie. And this wouldn't break any Wikipedia rules concerning external links...but posting the link myself WOULD break the rules. I can only ask that folks here take a look and if anyone thinks it would be useful to others, to please post the link. Here's the synopsis: http://www.moviecheat.com/ShowDetails.php?mid=146 Rasi2290

After reading through your page i can definatley say i WILL NOT be making any such links! "The ass worms leave big bloody holes when they come out, and once they're out they rip people apart." I cant imagine that being "useful and informative" to anyone.

Stupid writer

I'm not in the habit of making such comments on WP, but, having just seen the film on TV, the screenplay is unmitigated crap. I know cinema rquires a "temporary suspension of belief" but to what extent? Two guys stuck in the back of the Rockies in winter in a hunter's cabin - and they don't have a gun??? C'mon! TINYMark (Talk) 03:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTAFORUM ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ② ^talk 22:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay... but what does this have to do with this article? Nobody can simply edit the article with their own opinion on the film as a whole; the idea of a one-sided article does not really fit the standards of Wikipedia. User:Icebox482000 05:21, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it was set in derry maine. The screenplay actually was very close to the novel, which this writer above has not read.

They have a gun, its 4 guys. what movie have you been watching??--Vagrantdead (talk) 00:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From the heading "Stupid writer", I presumed that you were referring to the writer of the plot synopsis in the Wikipedia article. You weren't, but it still applies. Somebody failed high-school book reports. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.250.31 (talk) 21:05, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dogan

Is it possible we may be seeing a mind Dogan in the telepathy scenes? This being a reference to Stephen Kings other work the Dark Tower. 24.239.66.142 (talk) 04:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

"Dreamcatcher did break even against an estimated $68 million production budget." That's not how this math works. The box office is not profit. It's the income of all combined ticket sales. Theatres take about half of it, and the studio spent money to market the film on top of the production budget. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.45.22.127 (talk) 11:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final Flight of the Osiris

Was mention of the short removed or was it never here? It needs to be added that it was released with the film. IRMacGuyver (talk) 02:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dreamcatcher (2003 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510101202/http://www.laweekly.com/2012-04-19/film-tv/Lawrence-Kasdan-interview/ to http://www.laweekly.com/2012-04-19/film-tv/Lawrence-Kasdan-interview/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]