Talk:Disneyfication

This article was nominated for deletion on September 25, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Culture Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Globalization Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

— JIP | Talk 09:05, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Variations on Definition

The Pop-culture definition of Disneyfication or Disneyize, in my opinion, would have more to do with the editing of content in their movies, the changing of endings, and the refusal to release controversial material like Fahrenheit 9/11 or Song of the South. I would like a broader viewpoint as this is how I have heard it refered to, by Scociology Professors, John Q. Publics, and a few Disney Park Employees and not the current definition on the page. ~anonymous 14 Sept 2006

Reply to Above

Yeah, Disneyfication is being mixed up with Disneyization. Disneyfication is the 'Disneyfying' of stories, whilst Disneyization is the term display here as Disneyfication.

I tried to correct this, and wrote this below for the article, however it keeps getting reverted. Perhaps someone with more knowledge of Wikipedia will know what to do.

Disneyfication (not to be confused with Disneyization) is a pejorative term which describes the transformation of existing literary and cultural stories into into a childlike, family, perhaps simpler, form. It is in reference to the Disney catalogue of movies, which takes traditional literature and stories and makes them light-hearted, comedic (often including the funny or cute sidekick) and suitable for childrens viewing - sometimes in contrast to the original story.

Disneyfication may be accused of sanitizing history or literature, Americanizing it, or making it overly saccharine. Richard Schickel, in his book 'The Disney Version' most scathingly attacks Disneyfication, explaining that "magic, mystery, individuality, were consistently destroyed when a literary work passed through this machine that had been taught there was only one correct way to draw."

Opponants argue that Walt Disney is just the latest in a long line of storytellers, and in opposition to accusations that his retelling of fairy tales ruins them, identify that the Brothers Grimm were not the authors of their fairytales, but rather were the first to compile and transcribe them. The stories originally passed orally between storytellers, each changing and modifying them as they saw fit. Walt Disney is just continuing this tradition. However, this arguement does not refer to the Disneyfication of more modern literature, such as Disney's animated movies of The Hunchback of Notre Dame or Tarzan. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.188.139 (talk) 17:21, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it is really confusing, Disneyization vs. Disnefication. I noticed though that both are mentioned in the article. I thought it was more about commercialization of the childhood experience rather than the brand itself. Or does it mean to pass an old story into a Disney filter? I'm confused but will read up on it. Warren (talk) 18:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Your references seem to be unclear and insufficient because there are no links to them so I may reference them. Also, your text is missing some citations such as when you mention "theming" and "merchandising".Asanc382 (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Asanc382: A good start, but you really need to write more and be more explicit with your comments. Maybe offer places to go to for citations? Or explain what you mean by the references being "unclear and insufficient"? Alfgarciamora (talk) 15:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disneyfication. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527152759/http://www.egs.edu/faculty/jean-baudrillard/articles/disneyworld-company/ to http://www.egs.edu/faculty/jean-baudrillard/articles/disneyworld-company/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:28, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Hist401

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 January 2023 and 12 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AliResen, Dred562 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by AliResen (talk) 05:17, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Add more images?

Biohistorian15 (talk) 12:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]