Talk:Disney Jr./Archives/2015
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Disney Jr.. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I think renaming "Disney Junior" is fine
I think I agree with this. I made a huge mistake about this and I wanted to treat the page as a channel. Oh well. Rename it "Disney Junior" again and let it still focus on its channel while its block can focus on the Disney Channel page under the "Disney Junior" block section. Sorry about this, I won't do this again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon J. Marcellus (talk • contribs) 20:35, 28 March 2012
Melodies
@Electricburst1996: where do you suggest DJ Melodies direct to if not a section here? How is it not appropriate? Not sure it's big enough for own page so subsection makes sense to me. 64.228.90.87 (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Devoting an entire section to a specific program violates WP:UNDUE. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 08:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
- Only if it has its own page, IMO. 174.92.133.112 (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Redirects
Worth mentioning how trying to view any page on DisneyJunior.Disney.Com from Canada will redirect people to the inferior DisneyJuniorChannel.Ca homepage rather than a specific show where stuff is lumped together messily? Can't access unique clips or music or games... can we embed proxy links to allow Canadians to check the official sites listed on Wikipedia? 174.92.133.112 (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
- Stop making the Disney CA transition such a mess. In a word; no. Everyone who has messed up through the Family--->DHX transition needs to calm down and just wait until January when everything is settled, and no, we don't care about linking to 'unique clips or music or games' because we're not a division of Disney's promotional department; be neutral and stop pushing a certain promotional POV. We're certainly not going to promote rounding around regional blocks that are there for good reason; sorry if DJCA's site is terrible, but it's their site, and we respect that, no matter how we feel about it. Nate • (chatter) 03:30, 17 October 2015 (UTC)