Talk:Der brænder en ild/GA2
(Redirected from Talk:Der Brænder en Ild/GA2)
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 04:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
Infobox
[edit]- The movie poster image requires an alt description, so please add one
- Any sources out there for the "budget" parameter?
- Any sources out there for the "gross" parameter?
Lead
[edit]Paragraph 3
[edit]- "Like several other films adapted by Korch's popular family novels, the film developed a cult following and is regarded as one of the best from the Korch-era." --> No source for this in the lead (or in the article); please add one
Plot
[edit]- All great! :)
Cast
[edit]- Great!
Production
[edit]- There's no mention of the film being based off the book of the same name by Morten Korch here? This is a major piece to the article (and the film in particular!)
- "The highly experienced Henning Karmark was the head producer of the film.[1]" --> "highly experienced" sounds a bit bias; please remove
Release and reception
[edit]- "Journalist Svend Kragh-Jacobsen of Berlingske wrote a favorable review of the film on its release date.[8]" --> Anything to note about Kragh–Jacobsen's review here?
- "The film was distributed to home media on DVD in 2003 and again in 2014 by Nordisk Film.[7]" --> Were both releases distributed by Nordisk Film?
- Not the nominator, just a Dane with a fondness for this movie, but yes Nordisk Film owns the rights and did both releases. MPJ-US 02:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
End of GA Review:
[edit]A very good article with just a few mistakes. At first, I thought this may be missing some key things, but after a quick Google search, I realized this movie's article is really using all of its sources out there and ix extremely broad in its coverage! Great work! Please @PING me here with any questions, comments, or concerns. Once again, good job! Thanks and cheers, Carbrera (talk) 02:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)!
- Sorry, but I failed the article due to inactivity for over a week. Please renominate it in the future and I'll gladly review it again. Thanks. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 03:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC).