Talk:Denmark–Iran relations

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The Sassanids were exchaning ambassadors with Denmark - really? Does anyone have a source for this? The closest thing to diplomatic relations between Persians and Scandanavians was the embassy of Ibn Rustah to the Viking Rus in the tenth century, well after the Sassanid period, and a one-way exchange as far as we know.--Jpbrenna 04:55, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I checked the link and it says some Sassanian coins have been found in Denmark. This does not neccesarily mean there were direct relations: Roman coins have been found in India, but there was no exchange of ambassadors between Rome and any of the states of ancient India. It is noteworthy, but I don't think we can view it as evidence of diplomatic relations.--Jpbrenna 16:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Even Ahmad ibn Fadlan didn't go so far north, and there is no documentation at all for direct relations between Persia and Denmark. Nor between Denmark and Arabia, eventhough Arabic silver coins have been found in many parts of the country. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 18:38, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, the information about the 17th century mission seems interesting so I'll replace the text with this instead. Valentinian ^{(talk) / (contribs)} 18:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Denmark–Iran relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]