Talk:First Republic of Armenia/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Democratic Republic of Armenia/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 14:59, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: Four found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- ...as well as Alexandropol and Echmiadzin which they wanted a railroad to be built to connect Kars and Julfa with Baku. What is this supposed to eman?
- The Armenian and Georgian members of the Republic’s delegation began to stall. Which republic is this?
- Nevertheless, it was forced to sue for negotiations at Treaty of Batum, which was signed in Batum on June 4, 1918. "it"?
- a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Ref #3[2] leads just to a book listing. as the book is 125 pages long, we need page numbers for these cites. As it is a US Congress document presumably it is available online somewhere?
- As I cannot access the other references, I shall assume good faith.
- Administration section is completely uncited.
- Ref #15 - Strategics textbook, 9th grade is not accepatble as a reliable source.
- Military section is uncited
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Military section is over detailed. A prose summary is all that is neccessary. We don't need to know how many underpanst the army had!
- The Geography section should be converted into prose with a description of the geography, rather than tables which add little to the understanding.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article needs a lot of qwork before it is worthy of GA status.
- It needs a thorough copy-edit.
- It needs fully referencing.
- Page numbers for the US Congress document cites, also an online link if possible.
- Better reference for the Military section.
- Better referencing throughout.
- When that has been done, take it to WP:Peer review and the then if you like renominate at WP:GAN. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- This article needs a lot of qwork before it is worthy of GA status.
- Pass/Fail: