Talk:2015 Delhi Legislative Assembly election

Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015
All 70 seats in the Legislative Assembly of Delhi; 36 seats needed for a majority
Incumbent Chief Minister; President's rule;	; ;

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

India: Delhi / Politics Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled 2015 comment

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The essence of any democratic election is the list of promises which each contesting party displays to the electorate. This list, called a manifesto, describes the issues on which the election is being held. Hence, I propose that the manifesto of each political party be included in the page for the sake of completeness of information on the topic. I propose to include a section titled "Party Manifestos" before the section "Contestants".

Thanks, Abhishek100292 (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- I agree that Manifestos must be included in the election page. Rasulnrasul (talk) 18:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: Your request should be accompanied by a complete and specific description of what you want to be added, which is to say that you should specify exactly what text should be included in your proposed section. Pishcal — ♣ 18:53, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can some one fix the content in manifesto section directly asking users to go to certain party websites. I am just not sure how to do it without any one pouncing on me or edit waring A m i t 웃 03:31, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2015

This edit request to Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The date for election in the schedule (table) has a typo: The date of poll should be Feb 7, 2015 instead of Jan 7, 2015 please change the date of poll in Schedule section from Jan 7 to Feb 7. Aniket.pugaonkar (talk) 18:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pishcal — ♣ 18:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Manifesto High lights

Why Content of manifesto are being constantly removed ? Its important to put highlights of Manifesto instead of just links or saying released in party website ?

Rasulnrasul (talk) 08:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this. The information being given by the party manifestos should be included on the page.

Abhishek100292 (talk) 09:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But not by citing the party page itself. The manifestos were removed with this comment that without proper citation adhering to WP:CITE not to put the content back in. If the details are notable and citation from neutral places and not from party website i dont have any issues A m i t 웃 11:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Amit. For the section "Aam Aadmi Party" in "Manifestos", I propose to edit the current line along with a neutral citation.

Edit: The Aam Aadmi Party will release its Manifesto by January end. However, they have claimed that it will be based on a series of discussions called Delhi Dialogue which they have held with the citizens and experts in the city since past two months.

Citation: http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/delhi-dialogue-sets-motto-for-governance/article6828377.ece

Abhishek100292 (talk) 13:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agree for sure any content without proper citation should not be included, but Manifestos section is removed completely previously. Adding manifesto issues and promises (with proper citation) is required. Rasulnrasul (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Abhishek, the citation you provided doesnt link Delhi Dialogue with the AAP manifesto. A m i t 웃 15:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rasul, Agreed, a summary of manifesto and not such a large section and when the manifesto section was removed it was merged with the Campaign section at that point in further edits - Wikipedia is not a directory either. A m i t 웃 15:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amit, I recently noticed that you removed a link to congress party's election manifesto citing we should not refer to party webpage. Could you please tell me where exactly it's mentioned in WP:CITE. Thanks Jinesh Amit, Please also let me know why you think the Delhi Dialogue process which AAP uses for formulating their manifesto should not be mentioned in this section. Thanks Jinesh

here

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability#Reliable_sources A m i t 웃 06:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Amit, the link you provided does not support your claims. No where is it mentioned that we are not allowed to refer to party webpages. I hope you must be convinced yourself by now. [[User::Jineshkj|Jinesh]]

Aam Aadmi Party has released its manifesto for the elections. [1] I propose that the details such as manifesto highlights and the citation be added to the section "Aam Aadmi Party" under section "MAnifestos". Thanks, Abhishek100292 (talk) 06:46, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2015

This edit request to Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Is it some kind of bias towards a particular political party that only those opinion polls are added which are favourable to it and not those which are not favourable? Why zee news- Taleem poll was still not added while HT and ABP polls were added within minutes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.152.221.150 (talk) 05:58, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pls include the latest opinion poll by Zee News. Seat Share: BJP- 39, AAP- 29, Cong- 2; Vote Share: BJP 45, AAP- 37, Cong- 10 http://indiareckoner.net/2015/01/poll-survey-who-leads-the-race-for-delhi-cms-post-part-3/ 59.152.221.150 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please provide a direct link to Zee News website; indiareckoner.net is not a reliable source. Zee News-Taleem survey from 19 January is already present. It shows BJP winning -- no need to cry bias. utcursch | talk 06:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can the new 4 opinion polls be added swiftly please: The week-IMRB 04/02/15- Seats: BJP- 36, AAP-29, CONG- 4, OTH-1 Vote Share: BJP-39%, AAP- 37%, Cong-12%, OTH- 12% http://week.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/theWeekContent.do?contentId=18331235&programId=1073755753&tabId=13&BV_ID=@@@&categoryId=-224501

IBN7-Data Mineria 04/02/15: Seats- BJP- 36, AAP- 27, CONG-7, OTH- 0 http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-three-out-of-four-opinion-polls-show-bjp-ahead-of-aap-2058283

India TV- C Voter 04/12/15: BJP-36, AAP-31, CONG-2, OTH-1 Vote Share: BJP- 44%, AAP- 43%, CONG- 8%, OTH- 5% http://www.indiatvnews.com/politics/national/bjp-may-win-delhi-polls-aap-close-behind-says-india-tv-cvoter-25835.html

Zee News- Taleem 04/02/15: BJP- 32-36, AAP- 30-34, CONG- 3-5 Vote Share- BJP- 40.7%, AAP- 40.2%, CONG- 19.1% http://zeenews.india.com/news/delhi/close-fight-between-bjp-aap-arvind-kejriwal-edges-kiran-bedi-as-delhis-preferred-cm-zee-taleem-survey_1541442.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.152.221.150 (talk) 02:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done utcursch | talk 03:22, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1) These 2 still not added: A) The week-IMRB 04/02/15- Seats: BJP- 36, AAP-29, CONG- 4, OTH-1 Vote Share: BJP-39%, AAP- 37%, Cong-12%, OTH- 12% http://week.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/theWeekContent.do?contentId=18331235&programId=1073755753&tabId=13&BV_ID=@@@&categoryId=-224501 B) India TV- C Voter 04/02/15: BJP-36, AAP-31, CONG-2, OTH-1 Vote Share: BJP- 44%, AAP- 43%, CONG- 8%, OTH- 5% http://www.indiatvnews.com/politics/national/bjp-may-win-delhi-polls-aap-close-behind-says-india-tv-cvoter-25835.html

2) VOTE SHARE still not updated for any of the 4! Pls update as that will affect the line trend.

SAD

BJP is contesting election in alliance with SAD. Can someone find relevant source and add this to article? Regards, -Nizil (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information about SAD has always been present in the article. utcursch | talk 06:18, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion Polls

User:Utcursch, would you please explain why you are removing contents from this table. You also seem to be mangling the dates and references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jineshkj (talk • contribs) 05:39, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not removing any content - you removed ET-TNS survey. As for the dates, I'm fixing them. utcursch | talk 06:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1) These 2 LATEST opinion polls still not added: A) The week-IMRB 04/02/15- Seats: BJP- 36, AAP-29, CONG- 4, OTH-1 Vote Share: BJP-39%, AAP- 37%, Cong-12%, OTH- 12% http://week.manoramaonline.com/cgi-bin/MMOnline.dll/portal/ep/theWeekContent.do?contentId=18331235&programId=1073755753&tabId=13&BV_ID=@@@&categoryId=-224501 B) India TV- C Voter 04/12/15: BJP-36, AAP-31, CONG-2, OTH-1 Vote Share: BJP- 44%, AAP- 43%, CONG- 8%, OTH- 5% http://www.indiatvnews.com/politics/national/bjp-may-win-delhi-polls-aap-close-behind-says-india-tv-cvoter-25835.html

2) VOTE SHARE still not updated for any of the 4 including that of the Zee Taleem and IBN-Mineria! Pls update as that will affect the line trend.

The week-IMRB is already present. The news date is 4 February, but the actual survey was conducted during 22-24 January. Same with India TV-CVoter -- the actual survey date is 25-31 January. I don't have enough time to update the % right now. Hope another editor else does that. utcursch | talk 04:36, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

India TV- Cvoter poll is a new one conducted in the last week of january. The one already there is the one conducted in the week before. This is new one so pls post it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.152.221.150 (talk) 05:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are both 18–24 January (fourth week) and 25–31 January (last week). Not in the vote share section, though -- like I said I don't have time to update that section right now. Hope someone else can help. utcursch | talk 06:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 3 February 2015

This edit request to Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

BJP won 31 seats and not 34 as mentioned in the summary box shown at the right top corner of the page. Source : http://www.ceodelhi.gov.in/OnlineERMS/PERMORMANCE/P10.pdf So please please change 34 to 31 right away. AkhilSivadas (talk) 05:45, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Fixed. utcursch | talk 06:22, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2015

This edit request to Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Infobox parameter need to be changed.

Please change

 | previous_mps      = 2015

to <source lang="diff"> | previous_mps = </syntaxhighlight>

as this is creating a broken link on the top of infobox.

Architjain11 (talk) 13:23, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{Done}} Thanks for pointing that out, and explaining what was causing the problem - Arjayay (talk) 15:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150408022850/http://www.livetv24.tv:80/ to http://www.livetv24.tv
Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150207111031/http://blog.datamineria.com:80/ to http://www.blog.datamineria.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:09, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]