Jump to content

Talk:Dee Why

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Origin of Name

[edit]

The reasons why the area is known as 'Dee Why' will, realistically, never be known for sure. This doesn't mean that suggestions cannot be put forward, however these hypotheses need to be referenced from a reliable source, otherwise they will be removed from the article. If you know of a reason given for Dee Why's name, please take the time to find your source first, and perhaps a short list can be made in the 'History' section. Terovian (talk) 08:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed this:
  • Lawrence Hargrave, in his unpublished 1910 manuscript Lope de Vega, theorised that the suburb's name was evidence of the Spanish explorer in pre-settlement Australia, arguing that Meehan misread some local carved initials (since lost): "De V" – for de Vega.[1]
I don't think we should include a fringe theory from an unpublished manuscript written by an unrecognised amateur historian (even if he is famous for another reason). It would be different if this theory was discussed in a secondary source. The theory is in fact extremely silly, and we shouldn't give it recognition. (And incidentally it's a different Lope de Vega from the one linked to.)--Jack Upland (talk) 03:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Digging deeper, the Australia Dictionary of Biography refers to Hargrave's "elaborately constructed, circumstantial and obsessively held Lope de Vega theory", but doesn't mention Dee Why. The archeologist Denis Gojak in Placenames Australia comments "But another contribution he made has now almost been completely forgotten—a speculative secret Spanish history of Sydney, complete with its own placenames". However, this article again doesn't mention Dee Why. Gojak does mention the Dee Why theory in his blog "The Secret Visitors Project" which is devoted to pseudoarcheology and which clearly does not support Hargrave's theories. It is clear that this is a very obscure and very fringe theory.
This pamphlet, "Why Dee Why" discusses several theories of the name's origin, and debunks the Hargrave theory in a distorted form.--Jack Upland (talk) 08:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Hargrave, Lawrence (1910), Lope de Vega, the Author, retrieved 19 April 2017

Clubs

[edit]

Is it worth adding a list of clubs in the Dee Why area ?
Like the RSL club , Builders Club etc ?
Alxxthegeek (talk) 05:38, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Dee Why. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dee Why. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]