Jump to content

Talk:DayJet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:DayJet/Comments)

Taxis in the Sky

[edit]

There was an article in The Atlantic Monthly about DayJet. Taxis in the Sky. —216.68.194.99 (talk) 02:19, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That actually looks like a worthwhile article and may make a good ref as well. I have added it to the External Links section of the article. - Ahunt (talk) 13:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - i made an edit regarding the five states listed as destinations. i think the fact that 45 airports are served in those 5 states is what is important... more than any other airline i think. well, please revert if you like my edits - someone?!?! --NicholasSThompson (talk) 06:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well, i was looking at more of my edits. i think they're right!! check the references when you get a chance. one thing in particular that is confusing for this airline is that to fly nonstop and or direct (same plane with one stop possible...) you have to be heading to or coming from a "dayport". in other words to get from their smallest destination to another of their smallest destinations ("daystops...") you have to transit a dayport and bid for another ticket on another segment. a "daybase" has aircraft on standby and is where pilots begin and end shifts--NicholasSThompson (talk) 07:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey - i don't know what deserves to be on wikipedia and what should be deleted but i think dayjet will be adding lots more destinations in the next year or so. it is the largest customer of Eclipse Aviation and the Eclipse 500s it uses may never have been made if DayJet did not exist. having said that, the company could go out of business much like Hooters Air did! NicholasSThompson (talk) 09:27, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What should be included in this article is information that is verifiable under Wikipedia policies. It says:

"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—meaning, in this context, whether readers are able to check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether we think it is true. Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or is likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed."

I hope that helps explain it. - Ahunt (talk) 11:19, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an on-demand service

[edit]

Looking at the Company's website, I see that one of the first things stated is the fact that theirs is an "on-demand" service. So I have added the phrase "on-demand" to this article in an attempt to make the overall meaning clearer. abl (talk) 17:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DayJet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked - Ahunt (talk) 23:53, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DayJet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted as refs are still broken. No better version on Archive.org. - Ahunt (talk) 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DayJet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:03, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archived links are broken, reverted. - Ahunt (talk) 16:28, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DayJet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All archived versions are broken, reverted. - Ahunt (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on DayJet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:46, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:DayJet/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

so, this is an unusual airline of course. kind of hard to describe things. i was editing some stuff a while ago but it got reverted for "vandalism"... well, didn't mean it that way. anyway, the fact that 45 destinations are served per seat is important - more so than that they happen to lie in 5 states. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NicholasSThompson (talk • contribs) 07:01, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 21:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 13:02, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DayJet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:DayJet&oldid=1206898071"