Talk:David Beharall/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. There are a few relatively problems with this article and if the editors require I can provide some pointers to help, drop a line on my talk page. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

• It is reasonably well written.

  a (prose): b (MoS):

Prose is good, a 8/10.

• It is factually accurate and verifiable.

  a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

• It is broad in its coverage.

  a (major aspects): b (focused):

I'm passing this now, but there is a significant problem here: Behrall's personal life and life after football is totally lacking. For someone who retired so recently I am prepared to pass this now, but as standards rise this may be delisted in future if this information is not incorporated.

• It follows the neutral point of view policy.

  a (fair representation): b (all significant views):

• It is stable.

  

• It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.

  a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

Obviously, an image would be nice.

• Overall:

  a Pass/Fail: