Jump to content

Talk:Dark Sector

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

so....

[edit]

His right arm is infected with a virus. The design of his right arm inspired the art style for warframe. Which could mean the virus spread, and the warframes arent suits but completly infected people? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.87.184.155 (talk) 23:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Actually WarFrame was released before Dark Sector. Just take more attention and read wikia.

http://warframe.wikia.com/wiki/Tenno For example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.8.32 (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell are you talking about? -017Bluefield (talk) 20:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Odd that the company felt it necessary to mention the in-game nature of the footage, considering its behind-the-player perspective and noticeably sub-par graphics.

Sigh... another game, developed on PC's, made available on 360 and PS3, with no PC version in the works. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingoomieiii (talk • contribs) 15:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Debate over the style change

[edit]

I know that in the consumer community, there is a lot of division over the change in style from a science fiction setting to a more contemporary one. I would like to make specific mention of this, but unfortunately there is little I can do that would be credible and citable (message boards and word-of-mouth are hardly sufficient.) Anyone know where a good place to find something reasonably citable could be located? - Fearless Son 23:18, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check the Gamespot previews. I believe there is some mention of community input. 24.226.20.41 (talk) 04:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Giant Bomb just published an article about the history of Dark Sector's development. According to that the change is style wasn't their own decision, but was done after pressure from publishers:
Sinclair was on the road for almost a year pitching Digital Extreme’s vision for Dark Sector, and the resulting feedback was scattered.
“Can you set in present day?” said Sinclair, who claimed these were more-or-less direct quotes from executives. “Can you give the guy an eye patch? Can you make his cod piece larger?”
[...]
Sinclair distinctly remembered a meeting with Sony. The company thought the game looked cool, but asked the studio if it would consider dropping sci-fi and setting it during the Civil War.
Frustrated, Sinclar returned to Digital Extremes and tried to reshape the pitch, based on what he’s been hearing from publishing executives. Briefly, Dark Sector became about superheroes set in the modern day. It retained some of what Digital Extremes had dreamed up, but not much.
[...]
The most consistent feedback? Change the setting, as sci-fi was a non-starter. World War II was a popular suggestion, despite the popularity of other sci-fi shooters, like Bungie’s Halo.[1]
fisk0 (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dark Sector Banned in Australia

[edit]

Due to high impact Violence. http://au.gamespot.com/news/6186009.html?tag=latestnews;title;0 220.233.7.176 (talk) 05:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Differing Cover Art?

[edit]

Would it be appropriate to add a listing to this of the different cover arts for the game and where they are available worldwide? Nahka (talk) 16:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot discussion

[edit]

The plot description appears to be a bit over descriptive, Perhaps it should be summerized into a more compact version?--Techercizer (talk) 01:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A bit? It's huge. It should be stripped down to the basic notable plot-points. Moccamonster Talk 17:09, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the last part where Hayden loses control of his right arm is because Mezner was still alive. So his arm was responding to the transmitter...that is until he sticks the glaive into Mezner's head with his left hand. Wonder why Hayden was not electrocuted by the charged glaive though. Andrea75 (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ahem...I already dealt with it. -017Bluefield (talk) 04:23, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 external links on Dark Sector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:54, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dark Sector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dark_Sector&oldid=1201360651"