Talk:Dangerous and offensive trades

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2023. The result of the discussion was keep.

India Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Possible rename

At the AfD for this page, it was suggested that this be renamed. I agree the ampersand isn't appropriate in the title as it wouldn't typically be used in a statute. Capitalization should also be sentence case.

Personally I think Offensive trades is more common but I'd be happy with either that or Dangerous and offensive trades. Any other users have a preference?

Pinging @James500 as he was the one who suggested a rename to Dangerous and Offensive Trades. Oblivy (talk) 05:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Oblivy: I agree that the ampersand should be removed. I agree that capitalization should be sentence case. Apart from that, I have no preference about the page name. I found names as diverse as offensive or dangerous or noxious trades or businesses or manufactures. I have no idea which of those names is most widely used, and I do not have time to try find out. If you want to move the page to Offensive trades, I do not care, provided there is a redirect at Dangerous and offensive trades. James500 (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll just change to Dangerous and offensive trades then. Shouldn't be controversial as it's mainly conforming the title to policy, no redirects needed. Oblivy (talk) 00:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]