Jump to content

Talk:Dana Air

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Danaidas

[edit]

Their crash just reported on CNN and BBC with at least 153 dead. 91.82.35.23 (talk) 16:23, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What is an aviation accient

[edit]

Read this- An aviation accident is defined by the Convention on International Civil Aviation Annex 13 as an occurrence associated with the operation of an aircraft which takes place between the time any person boards the aircraft with the intention of flight until such time as all such persons have disembarked, in which a person is fatally or seriously injured, the aircraft sustains damage or structural failure or the aircraft is missing or is completely inaccessible.[1]

Dana Air Flight 992 is an accident....William 14:43, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You left out an important part: "except when the injuries are from natural causes, self inflicted or inflicted by other persons, or when the injuries are to stowaways hiding outside the areas normally available to the passengers and crew..." So if it turned out to be a terrorist act (not impossible in Nigeria) would it still be an "accident"? A deliberate act is never an accident, even under the ICAO's definition. So it's better to call it a crash until we know for sure it was accidental. Harry the Dog WOOF 14:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Harry I accept your point about accident but I have put back the standard heading - Incident and accidents whatever the cause it is one or the other which is why it is used as a header we dont need to make up headings when the project guideline gives us one. MilborneOne (talk) 15:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In which case it should be "Incident or accident" because there is only one, and we don't know which it is yet. But it is more accurate to call it the 3 June crash. If the word crashed is OK in the body, the word crash should be OK in the header. The BBC ref (hardly a tabloid source) calls it the "Lagos air crash". That is accurate. This heading is not. It's not about making up headings, it's about being accurate, which is what Wikipedia is all about. If the standard headings don't accurately convey what happened, then use words that do. We are not rigidly bound by the guidelines. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ The Investigation Process Research Resource Site. "International Investigation Standards". Retrieved 7 May 2012.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dana Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:11, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dana Air. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:16, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]