Talk:Damp

Requested move 21 February 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 11:36, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Damp (disambiguation) → Damp – No primarytopic. Damp currently redirects to a completely unsourced article on Moisture. There are lots of other important meanings that readers care about, so disambiguation is better. Dicklyon (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 14:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. There are 14 entries listed at the Damp (disambiguation) page, none of which is WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 03:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Regardless of the moisture article's awfulness, it strikes me as the primary topic for all readers. Efforts should be expended on improving the moisture article (or perhaps deleting it?) rather than this workaround. Brycehughes (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I don't think there's a clear primary topic between moisture and Damp (structural). —Xezbeth (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I've just disambiguated a dozen incoming links for "damp", which were equally distributed to Damp, Germany, Damp (structural) and Moisture, the latter mostly being cases of WP:OVERLINK ("damp climate"). Btw, Damp (structural) is in dire need of TLC. No such user (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.