Talk:Cynthia Ross Friedman

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

ProfessorWatch (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.
Cynthia Ross Friedman (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared here)

Message from page subject

Please see Wikipedia talk:Conflict of interest#"My" Wikipage.. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Come on. I did not do my own page. I am plenty annoyed. And I am no fraud - so please remove the anonymous Nick edits or block him for attempt to defame. I am no shrinking violet. Cynthia Ross Friedman (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Friedman, I am very sorry that this has happened. It is against Wikipedia policy to defame anyone, and that policy is taken very seriously. I have notified the people who can act on things like blocking someone, which I am not able to do by myself. I've looked at the current version of the page, and I think that anything defamatory has already been removed, but if there is anything else that you would like me to remove, please point it out and I gladly will. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:03, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The template at the top of the page refers to User:ProfessorWatch, not to you. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected on my definition of "accomplished". Can also mean highly trained or skilled. But such an adjective should still come from a reliable source, not yourself, so as to not sound like gloating (even if it's true). I called you a solo "act", but in light of your "fraud" grievance, am fine if you'd rather "artist". Not so fine with repeating "singer". InedibleHulk (talk) 22:33, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and all good! Some disgruntled students are attacking the page. Quite pathetic but very annoying. Your changes are fine - thanks! Cynthia Ross Friedman (talk) 23:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

images as citations

I have removed the links to images of scanned or photographed news clippings on commons (which are all tagged for deletion there) and replaced them with proper bibliographic citations. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI tag

I have removed the COI tag on the article. In my view, subsequent edits by uninvolved editors have removed all content that does not belong, and have verified the remaining content sufficiently. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 17:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]