Talk:Culture of Rome

Italy Mid‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Culture Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I don't understand the purpose of this article. It has nothing that is not covered elsewhere. And why are soccer clubs listed under Culture? Roundtheworld (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's point is that of highlighting Rome's culture in a longer and more detailed page. You can go on Culture of Paris, Culture of London or Culture of New York City, and you'll find the exact same thing. These pages are about talking about the city's culture in more detail.--Theologiae (talk) 22:03, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with Roundtheworld. The article has no use in its present form and should be nominated for deletion if it continues to appear with information contained in other articles.Brutal Deluxe (talk) 10:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Culture in Rome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091002073926/http://www.itvnews.tv:80/Blog/Blog/the-50-most-visited-places.html to http://www.itvnews.tv/Blog/Blog/the-50-most-visited-places.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Culture in Rome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:47, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Culture of Rome, Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 31 December 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 12:09, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– Culture of Rome is an WP:XY redirect, currently to Culture of ancient Rome. The title Culture of Rome, Italy was presumably chosen as a WP:NATURALDIS, but ancient Rome was also in Italy (although Italy as a political entity was not unified until 1861), so it's a poor choice.

Even though it gets fewer page views, I think the "Italy" article should be moved over Culture of Rome. Ancient Rome gets over ten times as many as Italy, but very few of those come via the redirect, so moving the "Italy" article over it shouldn't be disruptive. The redirect has no incoming links.

Other options are to reverse the redirect per WP:CONCISE, or turn it into a disambiguation page per WP:NOPRIMARYTOPIC. Because of that option, should I list the redirect at RfD and refer to here? 94.21.10.204 (talk) 11:07, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose leave well alone. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:21, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, since we do not postfix "Rome" with "Italy" anyway (WP doesn't pointlessly tack on country names after world-famous cities). In this case, doing it is just downright silly, since ancient Rome was in the same place. As I often say, an attempt at disambiguation that simply results in another ambiguity or other confusion is a failure, and must be renamed. Move also to be WP:CONSISTENT with Rome, Music in Rome, Category:Culture in Rome, etc., versus Ancient Rome, Music of ancient Rome, Category:Ancient Roman culture, etc. The idea that disambiguation is needed at all here is false. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:26, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support or move to culture of modern Rome (maybe culture of contemporary Rome). "Rome, Italy" needs to go. Srnec (talk) 05:47, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The first title is more concise. Neutral on second title. Interstellarity (talk) 15:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Great Synagogue of Rome.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:46, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]