This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Paulmnguyen, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on September 19, 2010. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Wow, the article needs another tag for more cleanup tags. It has 12 of them! I am going to group the ones that discuss the article's worthiness and big-picture quality first and move the mechanical ones to the bottom of the multiple issues tag. Maybe then it can get a copy edit, but I'm doubtful... –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 19:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was able to pull a couple tags, but this article is still in bad shape and I am going to postpone the copyedit until the "essay-ness" and "unencyclopaedicity" of this article have been overcome. Comparing the article to the October 2008 version from which most of the cleanup tags are dated reveals an even more obviously-essay-like article than today's version. Maybe that will help those who wish to edit it. –Paul M. Nguyen (chat|blame) 19:54, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome! I think this page has very few inbound links and gets little to know attention. Hence your two years to comment on the tags being old and my six more years to come across this and sink the time in. I think it's a perfectly mediocre article now, albeit under reffed... JesseRafe (talk)
