Jump to content

Talk:Crown Building (Manhattan)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Sohom Datta talk 06:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Crown Building
The Crown Building
5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 660 past nominations.

Epicgenius (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  • 5x expansion confirmed by DYK check tool. Article is appropriately sourced, no issues with CV, neutrality, etc. Hook suggestions are all in the article and appropriately cited to reliable sources. I'm partial to ALT1 or ALT4, but promoter is free to pick any of the hooks, they're all decent. Photo is free, used in the article, and looks good at a small size. QPQ completed. No issues, looks good to me. ♠PMC(talk) 23:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Crown Building (Manhattan)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 20:35, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 750h+ (talk · contribs) 10:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Will review @Epicgenius:. Always nice to review these. 750h+ 10:35, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

prose

[edit]

lead

[edit]

site

[edit]

architecture

[edit]

history

[edit]
  • that his secret purchase had been announced publicly, since he had wanted to give the remove the comma
  • Heckscher bought James Roosevelt's residence at 3 West 57th Street, and two other houses at 3–5 West 56th Street, in late 1913. remove the commas
  • There would also have been an enclosed shopping arcade leading from 57th Street and from Fifth Avenue. remove the second "from"
  • largest real-estate loans ever placed on ==> "largest real-estate loans ever put on"
  • The structure was ultimately finished in 1922. remove "ultimately"
  • Women's Wear wrote that the building's completion coincided with the increasing concentration of businesses along 57th Street, while the New York Herald Tribune wrote that its construction accelerated the street's commercial redevelopment. I'd replace the second "the street's" with "its"
  • At the time, the structure was earning $700,000 in rent per year and was valued at $4.875 million for tax purposes. I'd split the sentence into "At the time, the structure was earning $700,000 in rent per year. It was valued at $4.875 million for tax purposes."
  • The building was renamed the Genesco Building in 1964, when Genesco became a major tenant. remove the comma
  • The real buyer was Imelda Marcos, the wife of i don't think "real" is necessary, or you could substitute it for something better sounding
  • Shoe companies opened showrooms within the building, and retail space was being rented for about $500 per square foot ($5,400/m2) by the late 1980s, making it among the world's most expensive retail space. ==> "Shoe companies opened showrooms within the building. Retail space was being rented for about $500 per square foot ($5,400/m2) by the late 1980s, making it among the world's most expensive retail space."
  • all racketeering charges in relation to the properties ==> "all racketeering charges relating to the properties"
  • program where condos' owners could remove the apostrophe

reception

[edit]
  • building as a "lovely slight from all the southern part of Central Park", particularly its comma should be within the quotation marks
  • Another critic, for the Condé Nast Traveler, described going through the hotel as akin to ==> "A critic for the Condé Nast Traveler described going through the hotel as akin to"

source review

[edit]

spot check

[edit]

I'll do five sources. 750h+ 07:50, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Footnote 187, which I've been able to access via ProQuest, supports 3 parts of the text. The Bernsteins alleged that they paid $235 million for the Crown Building, Herald Center, and 40 Wall Street is supported. he asserted that he had owned the building for several years before the Bernsteins' alleged purchase. is also supported. The Aquino administration attempted in early 1989 to sell the four Marcos properties to Morris Bailey for $398 million, over the objections of the Bernsteins and Khashoggi. is supported too. checkY
  • Footnote 92, a book which i've been able to access via archive.org, supports 1 part of the text checkY
  • Footnote 247 and 248 support the text. checkY
  • Footnote 138, accessed via ProQuest, supports the text checkY
  • Footnote 66 and 67 support the text. checkY

Spot check pass. 750h+ 08:15, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

plagiarism

[edit]

image review

[edit]
  • File:Crown Building New York.jpg - CC BY-SA 2.0
  • File:Frederick W. Stevens House.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:5 Av Apr 2024 07.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Crown Building 2 (4674795529).jpg - CC BY 2.0
  • File:Bird's eye view of Heckscher Bldg. LCCN2004673286.jpg - Public Domain
  • File:5 Av Apr 2024 16.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:5 Av Apr 2024 31.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:5 Av Apr 2024 98.jpg - CC BY-SA 4.0
  • File:Über allem weht stets das Sternenbanner... - panoramio.jpg - CC BY 3.0
  • File:Roof of the Crown Building (4688621274).jpg - CC BY 2.0

Passing image review. 750h+ 08:30, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.