Talk:Coyote Point Systems

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Regarding the speedy deletion of the Coyote Point Page. I am making my best effort to demonstrate the significance of this company by describing its role in the early "load balancing" industry, awards for products and technical innovations. I will continue to update this page on a regular basis, provided it is not "speedily deleted"!

First, you need to show how it is notable per the guidelines at WP:CORP. Basically, show reliable independent sources that have written about the company, i.e magazine or newspaper articles. Kevin (talk) 22:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Kevin, Moonriddengirl and anyone else who chimed in. I'll continue to work on improving this page and hope that the community will do the same. Please see my posting on User_talk:Moonriddengirl for some specific comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coyotekish (talk • contribs) 19:38, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added third-party citations, removed overt marketing copy, linked to additional Wikipedia entries, and corrected some grammar issues. Article should be neutral and notable enough to remove the policy notice. Kawika (talk) 01:04, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tense change

Should we change the tense of "Fortinet is" to "Fortinet was" ? Link8r (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]