Talk:Cousins (disambiguation)

Requested move

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 22:02, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cousins → Cousins (disambiguation) – Per WP:PLURALPT. I see nothing on this page to dissuade me from thinking that the clear primary topic of the term is the singular, Cousin; there can't be cousins unless there are at least two of them. bd2412 T 22:06, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copied and pasted per the editor's request: Support - and feel free to copy paste this support onto all similar moves. I think this is now a case for use of technical move rather than full RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per nom Gregkaye ✍♪ 07:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose this one. The dab page shows that "Cousins" is used for a number of things separate from the singular - a surname and multiple artistic works. It's thus more helpful to our readers to keep this as a separate dab page, per WP:PLURALPT. Dohn joe (talk) 13:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The surname is clearly of little interest, having been viewed less than 400 times in the past 90 days. In the same period, the kinship relationship has been viewed over 227,000 times! As for the popular culture topics, they are all relatively obscure; for the two films and the TV series titled "Cousins", I'll give you three guesses what the relationship between the main characters is. bd2412 T 02:47, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reiterate support. Cousins naturally comes in the plural. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:03, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Obvious. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:38, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Obvious. —innotata 05:49, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. kennethaw88 • talk 03:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.