Talk:Cosoryx

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cosoryx article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mammals Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 14 December 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 14:19, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cosoryx → Cosoryx furcatus – Perhaps this comes from a place of ignorance, but I believe the title should be Cosoryx furcatus instead of just Cosoryx, since the article refers to a specific species and not the genus as a whole. Slippery Shaman (talk) 18:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

support teh article is about the species not the genus. blindlynx (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - monotypic genera are always covered at the genus level (unless there is another article with the same name). See:[1] FunkMonk (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per FunkMonk. Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.