Talk:Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagatis

Catholicism Low‑importance

Correctio filialis de haeresibus propagatis is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Attention required

This article is Filial has been added to several Catholicism related templates. The article is of little notability, (the topic is a statement issued by a few critics of the pope that has received little coverage, nor a response from the church), and is of poor quality (for instance describing the head of the SSPX as a "Novus Ordo" scholar). It is and inappropriate for high-level navigation templates, and requires considerable work to assert notability.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Zfish118 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Zfish118, I've removed the term novus ordo scholar, as 1) Novus ordo is a loaded phrase 2) National Catholic Register never described them as scholars of the Mass of Paul VI so it was unsourced (I'm also not sure where I would put National Catholic Register on the reliable source scale).

Other concerns I have are the claim this is the first filial correction since 1333. That's a very strong claim and one we'd need more than the Register or the document itself for it to be included. Part of the reason it might be the first since... is because the phrase is rarely if ever used. I'm sure the events surrounding the Western Schism, Council of Basel, and Council of Constance could arguably be classified in a similar way if scholarly works used the term (which they don't). I'll post on BLPN because I think its a good idea to get eyes outside of the Catholicism WikiProject on this. TonyBallioni (talk) 19:19, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the second set of eyes! I mistakenly thought this had been spammed to several articles based on the "What links here report", and that attention would be required to clean that up. It was only the transcribed link from its addition to template:Catholicism, which I already removed, however. While the article clearly has issues, they are not urgent. –Zfish118^⋉talk 06:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed Category:Apostolic exhortations, as the statement was not issue by the pope, but to the pope. –Zfish118^⋉talk 20:45, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article's subject seems easily to pass muster according to guideline wp:GNG. (See, e.g.):