This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:University of Canterbury/International Human Rights Law (Semester One 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.
There are few inline easy-to-check sources, a seeming reliance on primary sources such as press releases and legal rulings and business policy statements, when articles should really be based on secondary one-step removed impartial sources such as newspapers and peer-reviewed articles, made by journalists without an axe to grind. The dominant POV here is anti-corporations.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Besides better sourcing of the material, there should also be a more comprehensive list of companies that have been sanctioned for or even accused of human rights violations.Timtempleton (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]