Talk:Organizational metacognition

This article was nominated for deletion on 10 December 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 9 December 2015 by reviewer SwisterTwister (talk · contribs).

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

New section

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. You may consider leaving your comments on the Talk page or escalating significant issues to the conflict of interest noticeboard.

Other examples of poor organizational metacognition have been published on military environments[1], pharmaceutical process simulations[2] and enterprise search environments, "Both searchers and the organization may not “know” that they “don’t know” (metacognition) the quality of their search expertise or search task performance."[3]

[1] http://www.computer.org/csdl/proceedings/hicss/2007/2755/00/27550190c.pdf [2] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.214/abstract [3] http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.23595/abstract

PHCleverley (talk) 11:05, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more specific. What exactly would you like to have changed, and where? Altamel (talk) 22:41, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]