Talk:Copperhead (Marvel Comics)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Copperhead (Marvel Comics) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
	This article has been marked as requiring an image. Please add one in accordance with guidance.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Proposed merge

Neither of the two articles are very long. The title 'Copperhead (Daredevil foe)' is not consistent with other article titles and it looks bad. I don't see why they shouldn't be merged. Spidey104 (talk) 20:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed... the material over the two looks like it can easily fit in one article. - J Greb (talk) 21:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto. I've notice that characters with the same name that are published by the same company are usually found in one article, particularly when the total material is such that it can fit in one. Merge 'em. Nightscream (talk) 21:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't agree more. -Sharp962 (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Merge two pretty weak articles, one of which is poorly disambiguated so, unless both can be heavily expanded,they need to be here. If one character gets a lot more page time then expand it and we can look into splitting it off to "Copperhead (name)" but until then.... (Emperor (talk) 12:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)_,[reply]

I merged the two articles. If one of these characters appears again and gets a lot of new information then we can split the article apart as Emperor suggested, and not back into the poorly titled article that was merged into this one. Thank you all for your opinions! Spidey104 (talk) 19:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]