Talk:Conscription in China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force

"Technically, military service with the PLA is obligatory for all Chinese citizens."

Is this sentence necessary? The phrasing states that "military service is obligatory" and then immediately refutes that exact statement. The conscription service is referred to as similar to the US Selective Service System multiple times in the article, and yet, it would be considered strange to say that "military service with the United States Armed Forces is technically obligatory for all male American citizens," and I'm sure that other countries with similar systems don't have the byline that "technically" service is obligatory. Seems like unnecessary coloring.AScanner (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]