Jump to content

Talk:2006 Connecticut's 4th congressional district election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Remove Partisan Smear

[edit]

Sandy, as in the Diane Farrell article, the tax smear attacking Diane Farrell has no place in a general overview of the election. Note that this is the only criticism of a candidate present in this article, it is not given any context, and no objective information is provided about Chris Shays record in Congress. I am giving you the opportunity to remove or modify the smear now, to more accurately reflect the NPOV required by Wikipedia's policies. In the event that you are not familiar with WP:NPOV, I suggest you read the primer at the link cited, especially the section regarding "undue weight."--Francisx 06:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:NPOV, WP:V and WP:RS, and please refrain from using words like "smear" with respect to referenced text from reliable sources, and from making further accusations towards me: remember that assuming good faith and civility are policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia presents balanced, neutral information from all points of view, based on reliable sources. You are welcome to add content from reliable sources which adds to or counteracts any information here, but that should not be from an individual's Letter to the Editor of a local paper, as in the Diane Farrell article. Letters to the Editor can be written by anyone, are not subject to journalistic fact checking, and are not reliable sources. Also, please take care with your section headings, as the inaccurate heading "partisan smear" is inflammatory and accusatory. Sandy 13:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Adding URL of deleted "tax smear". Sandy 22:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that having a criticism section is fine, but to maintain a neutral point of view, there must be criticisms on all of the candidates. Having only one mentioned shows bias.

Colea 02:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question. Why are there no criticism on Chris Shays on his brief bio, but there are of Diane Farrell? Why the double standard? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.86.126.212 (talk • contribs)

The easy way to remedy that is to add appropriate, well-sourced, non-biased criticisms on Shays' page. -- Sholom 13:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Foley/Chappaquiddick - Please be aware of WP:BLP

[edit]

Regarding this edit, please be aware of WP:BLP, particularly when attributing direct quotes to candidates. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we must get it right, particularly when putting words in the mouths of public figures. A CNN headline cannot be attributed to Shays as a direct quote: those were not the words he used, rather the headline of the article. Further, the words attributed as a direct quote from Kennedy were from his spokeswoman, according to the article. I have corrected the text and reinserted a corrected version. Sandy 06:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate content and original research

[edit]

Regarding this edit: please see my comment here. This edit is original research, and duplicated on both articles, unnecessarily. It does not rise to the level of inclusion in an encyclopedic bibliography.


Phil Maymin

[edit]

Why are Libertarian articles prohibited?

I do not support their party much; but, Mr. Phil Maymin is an actual candidate, w/ the "I approved this massage" commercial.

< http://mayminforcongress.com/index.htm?home.php >;

< http://mayminforcongress.com/home.php >;

< http://mayminforcongress.com >.

hopiakuta ; [[ <nowiki> </nowiki> { [[%c2%a1]] [[%c2%bf]] [[ %7e%7e%7e%7e ]] } ;]] 23:28, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook Election Polling

[edit]

The Facebook election "pulse" polling data is not a scientific poll. It is just the number of people on facebook signed up with the candidate, hardly an accurate number. It is inaccurate and erroneous. I will remove it.

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Connecticut's 4th congressional district election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Connecticut's 4th congressional district election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Connecticut's 4th congressional district election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Connecticut's 4th congressional district election, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2006_Connecticut%27s_4th_congressional_district_election&oldid=1196481081"