Talk:Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment supported by WikiProject United States Public Policy and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program.

IP Wikiproject

This page is being revised over the next week as part of the IP WikiProject. Changes include fleshing out the case, adding references, and dividing the article into sections. Echin (talk) 07:26, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Original research and Primary sources issues

I'm afraid my comments here are the similar to the ones I made at Talk:Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test. I see that both of these articles, and many more, are being updated as a class project as part of WP:WikiProject Intellectual Property law 2009 Berkeley.

First, I applaud what this group is doing. I think it's great to have a group of students who understand a topic jump in and write or substantially update articles like this.

However, the students need to understand Wikipedia's policies on original research and the use of primary sources. As with Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison test, this article's revision appears to be almost entirely original research by the recent editor, and almost exclusively taken from primary sources rather than secondary sources. The sole exception is the use of the Lemley et al. source. This article very much needs to be cleaned up, citing secondary sources, instead of the writer's own analysis of the case. TJRC (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Much of this article could be sourced to "Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law", Peter Groves, 1997. Relevant parts of this book, as of today at least, are available online at Google Books. My interest is only as a longtime Altai employee, beginning 1990.Mandruss (talk) 08:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 July 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved.(non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 12:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai Inc. → Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc. – There should be a comma in "Altai, Inc." in case name, just as in "Computer Associates International, Inc."; see., e.g., here, here and here. A redirect exists at the target, so admin assistance in required to effect the move. TJRC (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Adding a comma to the article title is not controversial and supported by MOS:LAW. -- intgr [talk] 07:56, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120531144659/http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/797/797.F2d.1222.85-1358.html to http://ftp.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/797/797.F2d.1222.85-1358.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]