Talk:Bencao Gangmu

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Books: Reference works

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article is supported by the Reference works task force.

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Change title?

Should the title be moved to "Bencao Gangmu" for consistency with other Chinese texts? Translations besides "Compendium of Materia Medica" include "The Great Pharmacopeia" (Joseph Needham), "The Great Herbal", etc. Keahapana 23:06, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. Per WP:USEENGLISH & WP:COMMONNAME, we should use the normal English name for this particular work. —

Llywelyn II

09:33, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another collection of monographes.....???

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19824365

--222.67.211.208 (talk) 11:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darwin misquote

Since the lead had two "citation needed" tags, I looked up the quote, and found it's mistaken.

Charles Darwin (1809-1882) once quoted the explanation of color formation of goldfish in The Compendium of Materia Medica to illustrate the phenomenon of the artificial selection of animals in his work The Origins of Mankind.^{[citation needed]} The Compendium of Materia Medica was called "the encyclopedia of ancient China" by Darwin thanks to its special contributions to the world's pharmacy, pharmacology, botany, and biology.^{[citation needed]}

Checking the Delphi Complete Works of Charles Darwin, he cites secondhand information from the Bencao gangmu several times, referring to Samuel Birch. "Mr. Birch, of the British Museum, has translated for me passages of a Chinese Encyclopaedia published in 1609, but compiled from more ancient documents." He refers "an ancient Chinese Encyclopaedia / encyclopaedia " (3 times), "the Chinese Encyclopaedia published in 1596", "the ancient Chinese Encyclopaedia", "a Chinese encyclopaedia", and "the old Chinese Encyclopaedia". He neither says "the encyclopedia of ancient China" nor "thanks to its special contributions to the world's …". The Bencao gangmu is classified as a Chinese materia medica or pharmacopeia, but not an encyclopedia, in the Western sense of the word. Neither is it considered a leishu Chinese "encyclopedia". I deleted the misquote and added better ones from Joseph Needham. Keahapana (talk) 23:39, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Probably The Origins of Mankind^{[citation needed]} is an error for either On the Origin of Species or The Descent of Man. Should not be the lead, but tantalizing. Vagabond nanoda (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pangolin scales

I added a brief explanation of given in the Bencao Gangmu for why pangolin scales are believed to be efficacious in TCM. Given the inconvenience of the present quarantine, perhaps we are owed an explanation for the bat-pangolin-human link (if true), and others may have more time to build this us (I think it deserves its own article). Vagabond nanoda (talk) 03:34, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Should we mention other products of (now) endangered species, too, that are mentioned in the Bencao Gangmu, like rhinoceros horn, tiger bones, and sturgeons? Or in Chinese herbology?

Added to UNESCO Memory of the World Register

In 2011, Ben Cao Gang Mu (《本草纲目》 Compendium of Materia Medica) was added to the UNESCO Memory of the World Register. Incidentally, it is named as Ben Cao Gang Mu, and not Bencao Gangmu. Earnulf Gery (talk) 17:37, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]